With Hoffman and Petry, Hughes did not miss the forest for the trees

August 16, 2023

GM Kent Hughes responds to media questions via Zoom following the Jeff Petry trade on August 15, 2023

On Sunday, August 6th, the Montreal Canadiens became the facilitating third party in a trade that saw defenseman Erik Karlsson shipped from the San Jose Sharks to the Pittsburgh Penguins. For the Pens to take on Karlsson’s enormous contract they needed to find a new home for blueliner Jeff Petry, and the Habs became involved to help navigate the deal.

When all was said and done, the Habs had relieved themselves of forwards Mike Hoffman and Rem Pitlick, without retaining any salary, and in return had received Petry at a reduced price (the Pens retained 25%), goalie Casey DeSmith, forward prospect Nathan Legare, and a second-round pick in 2025.

Then on August 15th, GM Kent Hughes dealt Petry (50% retained) to the Detroit Red Wings for young defenseman Gustav Lindstrom and a 4th round pick.

What can we read into these deals?

The market for Mike Hoffman was non-existent.

The forward group in Montreal has been crowded dating back to last off-season. Mike Hoffman has been available for months, with the Habs reportedly seeking nothing of consequence in return. It is now obvious that the only team willing to take him was doing so in order to offload a much more problematic contract.

It took considerable creativity on Hughes’ part, taking back contracts he knew he would have to flip, but that he would have a higher likelihood of being able to move. He added a second round pick and an asset for Laval, along with whatever he could fetch for Petry and DeSmith, while weaponizing cap space and freeing up roster spots.

This was brilliant business by Hughes.

Fans may have gotten greedy at this point, but Hughes could still see the forest within the trees.

Fans would have traded Hoffman for a bag of pucks but suddenly, with Petry returned in the package, fantasies evolved into first round picks. It’s funny how memories work.

It seems folks had a great recall of one night where Petry didn’t come to his goalie’s defense, but couldn’t recall that he was a player with no desire to be in Montreal, owned a 15-team no trade clause, and had seen his play decline in the past two years. They also seemed to miss that if there was a healthy market for Petry, Dubas would have already moved him.

Both Dubas and Hughes, along with every other GM in the league, knew the only reason Montreal was not on Petry’s no-trade list was because he couldn’t fathom this scenario ever unfolding. All involved knew Hughes would prefer to flip Petry, and surely every team not included in the no-trade list knew Hughes was unlikely to play hard ball.

It’s easy for fans to say hold him until the trade deadline and hope his value rises – they’re not the ones making decisions to steal time from developing defenders so they can give prime time to a player who doesn’t want to be there. Don’t we all remember how that went last time?

Hughes knew he had gotten value for a player (Hoffman) who lacked value. His goal was to open up a roster spot in the forward group and free up some cap space. He had accomplished that and more, and didn’t get distracted by a new sub-plot.

The Petry trade worked for everyone.

Yes, the Red Wings got Petry on good value. I’m not sure how he fits their rebuild, but that’s their problem. Petry also got a good deal – he’s a declining veteran with more children than the old woman who lived in a shoe and he wanted to be close to home. He can finish out his career in his home town wearing his Dad’s old number. That’s heart-warming stuff.

But let’s not pretend the Habs were playing Santa Claus here. Yes, they did Petry a solid, but it also works for them.

Lindstrom is a depth right-shot defender who may have more in him than he has shown so far. At worst, he can fill a role without forcing the kids to develop faster than is ideal, and they won’t hesitate to replace him with a kid who is ready. A fourth-round pick is also an asset. Ultimately, the Habs got some cap relief and assets for Mike Hoffman, who had no value on the market two weeks ago, but dealing Petry quickly also works for their cap management plan.

Hughes was clear. He had no interest in dragging the Petry situation out “trying to maximize every last piece of value in a trade.” He said, “I spoke with Jeff and he was thankful. That doesn’t mean we’re going to do things that are against our interests. But when we can work together to do what’s best for ourselves and the players, we’ll always try to do that. And we hope that, over time, players will take note and want to be a part of it.”

Best for ourselves and the players. Hughes got what he needed to out of the Petry deal.

Hughes will deal again before the puck drops on a new season.

It caused a little bit of a stir when Hughes acknowledged his hope was to avoid placing Carey Price on off-season LTIR unless an opportunity arose that would make it worth it, and followed that up by saying there were items he could not discuss that would make this possible. Since then fans and pundits have spun considerable potential trade webs.

It’s no secret that there are other contracts that Hughes would just as soon get rid of, and this is undoubtedly the summer of subtraction. After letting free agents – both restricted and unrestricted – walk, Hughes has shed the contracts of Joel Edmundson, Hoffman and Pitlick. It hasn’t been flashy, but some important rebuild work has been accomplished this summer.

The more likely outcome is that Hughes will deal one of his goalies to become cap compliant. But we can’t sleep on Kent Hughes. The level of creativity we have seen thus far may reveal itself again before training camp opens.

Published by Lori Bennett

Hockey is my hobby. I love a respectful hockey chat or debate, but it stops being fun if we're jerks.

12 thoughts on “With Hoffman and Petry, Hughes did not miss the forest for the trees

  1. Kent Hughes making thoughtful, measured moves ranging from highway robbery to modest gain all the while keeping the strategy and the future keenly in view. You’ve summed it up well, Lori. Kent Hughes has done well and he may have even more magic up his sleeve; new rabbits in his hat to behold before the puck drops on a new season. It’s good to be a Fan of the Habs these days!

    Liked by 1 person

    1. It’s hard to criticize any deal that he’s made. Anyone looking at the big picture can see his vision and what he’s working toward, while in the meanwhile being completely surprised when he pulls off the next deal to support his vision. It’s fun to watch.

      Liked by 2 people

  2. Thank you for this well reasoned piece. We tend to look for eye popping deals and miss the value of these lesser deals. This is almost as good a magic trick as Hughes pulled off last year in my view. The intangibles, like improved reputation, are huge for the future. Cap and roster flexibility are equally important. I find this to be a very intelligent set of moves.

    Liked by 3 people

    1. This was always going to be a summer of subtraction, which is not exciting. But Hughes has done well, moving Edmundson and Hoffman, and threw in Pitlick and round 2 of Petry. Anyone expecting big returns for any of these players was missing the point. This summer was what it needed to be, and Hughes has shown great patience and creativity.

      Like

  3. It would be interesting to see the Hughes “White Board” of the team in 3-5-7 years. These are the first few years to be most creative. Once the solid team is established, roster moves can be fewer but no less important. Bergevin left some very good young players (as a positive) along with some big contracts (the negative) he signed players to in hopes of long playoff runs. Well, MB got one run, improbable as it seemed.

    Lori, how far along would you say this rebuild is? My guess is about one/third. With all the injuries up and down the roster last season it was nearly a wash for talent assessment. That 5 rookie defensemen had to play at the same time did give them some unexpected experience. That Hughes snared Dach, Monahan and Newhook shows he’s not willing to wait 5 years to build a contender. Do you think this coming season will make a big difference in his projections for the future?

    Liked by 1 person

    1. I don’t think the additions of Dach, Monahan and Newhook mean Hughes is not willing to wait. Monahan was added because they had the LTIR flexibility and it fetched them another first round pick. If he can stay healthy, perhaps he becomes the veteran support in the years the kids are developing, or perhaps they move him for another asset at the deadline.

      I think the 3-5-7 view is a good one. In 3 years, Carey Price’s contract will be done and Dach will be due a new one. By then, they’ll know what he is. My suspicion is that’s when they see the window seriously opening. They’ll be progressively better before then, but not ready to be taken seriously. That’s my expectation.

      Like

  4. I echo the sentiments – great summary of HuGo. And agreed, their management of the team has been steady improvement while moving towards youth. I still can’t believe they got anything for Hoffman. Lindstrom may be a flier but who knows, D-men tend to develop late and HuGo have a bit of a track record for spotting diamonds in the rough.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. My suspicion is that Lindstrom makes the team out of camp and the young defenders are given time to develop in Laval. If so, his presence gives the Habs options on the right side come trade deadline, and freedom to move Savard if a team comes calling.

      Like

  5. Thanks you, Lori, for a terrific summation of Hughes creativity as you stated, ” But we can’t sleep on Kent Hughes. The level of creativity we have seen thus far may reveal itself again before training camp opens.”
    I would love if you had time or interest to do an article on Gorton’s house cleaning in Laval. That is where our Development team will apply their skills going forward.
    It is exciting to watch with awe the work that the HuGo Team has accomplished in less than 24 months.
    Cheers
    Kerry

    Like

  6. I have a feeling that The Laval Rockets will be covered intensely by many individuals and media. It should be an exciting couple of years for Montreal’s farm teams. Laval and Lions. Thanks for taking time to reply Lori. Cheers

    Like

Leave a comment